You measured so you know ratio? Point is that literary form of sacred texts of some religion is not basis of that religion. What matters in religon is its teaching.
That is rather simplified point of wiew. There is no genetical conectio between Christianity and Islam, so we could speak of same root. Judaism and Christianity are geneticaly related. Both are derived from Old Testament religion. Islam is founded on itsown interpretation of Judeo-Christian legacy, and there is no direct connection betwen it and previous two religions.
You obviously did not read what was written. Writers of Bible used textual motives from folk stories in Middle East (whic originated in Mesopotamia) to write their own cosmology, which, while sharing motivs with Mesopotamian myths, shows completely different theological outlook.
Nicene creed starts:
We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, and of all things visible and invisible.
not "We believe that there were water and sky, that languages were separated at Babylonian tower and that there was flod".
This was another crude simplification. In early Hebrew kingdom there were two religous movements: Monotheistic and polythesitic.There was clear distinction between them, Old Testament prophets are preaching against idolatry and refuse any religious connection with their polytheistic compatriots. Again essential thing to determine religion are its teachings.
Well you failed to see my point. Your theory is that Lessre gods rebelled against gigantic senior gods, and you stated Cronos and Ttians are examples of such gigantic senior gods. Descriptions from ancient Greek sources contradicts such interpretation of matters. And I just pointed details in wich that contradiction was shown.