Most Belarusian historians or Polish, Russian, Ukrainian or Lithuanian for that matter will not favour un-academic stories written by ethnographer Mikola Ermalovich in the 70s which have been adopted by Litvin movement recently.

And “academic” is synonymous for politically biased to me. There’s an obvious political interest in professional history. I can’t trust such a “science”.


It's inaccurate and misleading to state that eastern Balts in Lithuania are being Finno-Ugric based, Slavs and ***s.  Do you have any evidence to support your claim?

Did I say that? I mean the nation called "Lithuanians". Does it make a difference?