• This topic has 22 voices and 57 replies.
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 112 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #342022

    Anonymous

    image

    "The Europe of the future must no longer be envisaged in the mushy, ungovernable forms of the present European Union, which is a powerless Medusa, unable to control its borders, dominated by the mania of free-trade, and subject to American domination. We need to imagine a federal, imperial Grande Europe, ethnically homogenous (that is, European), based on a single autonomous area, and inseparably linked to Russia. I call this enormous continental bloc 'Euro-Siberia.' Having no need to be aggressive toward its neighbors because it would be inattackable, such a bloc would become the premier world power (in a world partitioned into large blocs), self-centered, and opposed to all the dangerous dogmas now associated with globalism. It would have the capacity to practice the 'autarky of great spaces,' whose principles have already been worked out by the Noble Prize winning economist, Maurice Allais. The destiny of the European peninsular cannot be separated from continental Russia, for both ethno-cultural and geopolitical reasons. It’s absolutely imperative for America’s mercantile thalassocracy to prevent the birth of a Euro-Siberian federation."

       — Guillaume Faye, FROM DUSK TO DAWN

    #360005

    Anonymous

    I disagree.

    1. Ethnically homogeneous, that is European? European ethnicity does not exist. And Russia is far from being ethnically homogeneous.

    2. Even more centralized than the EU? No, thanks.

    3. World separated into large blocks = world war, eventually Orwell's 1984.

    #360006

    Anonymous

    Sounds like much same thing as that Maltese right-winger proposed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperium_Europa

    #360007

    Anonymous

    I think the EU without all that buraucracy and politics (basically like EFTA), only an economic and defensive/military cooperation, free international trade being only an option, not neccessity – just when I look how cheap and usually low-quality Polish products damage Slovak economy… yay  ;D

    That Norman Lowell guy seems to be not quite sane…

    And btw Europe divided into blocks like Slavic union, Lego union, Elven union again would be a disaster and a potential ww3 launcher.

    EU is a good thing, only without all that crap around it.

    #360008

    Anonymous

    Muscovite imperialists and these pathetic Eurasianist freaks can shove their vision of extending Russian influence to all of Europe up their asses. In there future, no one will talk about "Greater Russia" anymore, quite the opposite will be the case – Russia will be further balkanized until one day only the original "Russian" territory is left – Moscow and the land around Moscow.

    Europe should consist of free nations, independent from American, Zionist and Russian influence.

    #360108

    Anonymous

    Muscovite imperialists and these pathetic Eurasianist freaks can shove their vision of extending Russian influence to all of Europe up their asses. In there future, no one will talk about "Greater Russia" anymore, quite the opposite will be the case – Russia will be further balkanized until one day only the original "Russian" territory is left – Moscow and the land around Moscow.

    Europe should consist of free nations, independent from American, Zionist and Russian influence.

    #360009

    Anonymous

    So today we have two schools of thought today in Russia? Euro-asianism vs Euro-Sibirianism?

    Euro-Sibir
    [img width=700 height=210]http://www.ljplus.ru/img4/r/e/rem_lat/_EvroSibir.JPG”/>

    Euro-asia
    image

    #360109

    Anonymous

    So today we have two schools of thought today in Russia? Euro-asianism vs Euro-Sibirianism?

    Euro-Sibir
    [img width=700 height=210]http://www.ljplus.ru/img4/r/e/rem_lat/_EvroSibir.JPG”/>

    Euro-asia
    image

    #360010

    Anonymous

    Mmmm, both equally appealing. :D

    #360110

    Anonymous

    Mmmm, both equally appealing. :D

    #360011

    Anonymous

    I can understand hypothetical union with Europe (I'm against it), but why with Middle Asia and Caucasus?  ;D

    #360111

    Anonymous

    I can understand hypothetical union with Europe (I'm against it), but why with Middle Asia and Caucasus?  ;D

    #360012

    Anonymous

    People still don´t understand that is not policy which is killing their culture but economics. There are economists who are still scream for new emmigrants, due to european lack of earn living for old people, not politicians. Europeans needs some kind of totality if their want preserve their various culture. New immigrants demands respect for their shitty traditions and sick laws, "but they support our economy!" Europe is not USA. We have right to defend our land because we are at home here.
    Because we live on fathers land:
    Nikola Emelin – Rus

    #360112

    Anonymous

    People still don´t understand that is not policy which is killing their culture but economics. There are economists who are still scream for new emmigrants, due to european lack of earn living for old people, not politicians. Europeans needs some kind of totality if their want preserve their various culture. New immigrants demands respect for their shitty traditions and sick laws, "but they support our economy!" Europe is not USA. We have right to defend our land because we are at home here.
    Because we live on fathers land:
    Nikola Emelin – Rus

    #360013

    Anonymous

    Chimpanzees should be brought in, they can be trained for all sorts of jobs and only need bananas to survive.  ;D  ::)

    Governments only have themselves to blame for a fertility crisis.  Maybe its' liberalism which should be blamed but society a hundred years ago had zero problem in providing homes and incomes for young adults.  If you told someone back in the 1820's that they would have to wait 40 years to own their own place they simply would have laughed.  That's not the case for everyone, supposedly groups like the Amish in North America have no problem with their community being able to provide for younger families.  The problem is that governments have a dystopic view on the individual.  Why is it the Government is supposedly responsible for an individual's health through a healthcare program but avows all responsibility in ensuring that the populace even has access to affordable and humane housing?  ???

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 112 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Slavorum

5 User(s) Online Join Server
  • kony97
  • Tujev
  • (o)possum tamer 🐀 (kris)
  • Nefario
  • Nexius